1. Catalan Combinatorics and Reflection Groups
It is now generally recognized that there are two different kinds of Catalan objects: nonnesting and noncrossing. C. Stump gave the problem session on noncrossing objects from the point of view of the subword complex.V. Reiner summarized four directions of study for these objects:
- Narayana and Kirkman refinements;
- Reflection group generalizations;
- Fuss-Catalan and Rational Catalan generalizations (the problem session on type A Rational Catalan combinatorics was given by B. Rhoades and N. Williams); and
- q-Catalan and (q,t)-Catalan numbers as bigraded Hilbert series.
-
A more complete introduction to this problem is given in V. Ripoll’s paper Lyashoko-Looijenga Morphisms and Submaximal Factorizations of a Coxeter Element [arXiv:1012.3825].
Let W be a well-generated irreducible complex reflection group. One of the major open problems in Catalan combinatorics that V. Reiner outlined was to give a uniform proof that noncrossing objects are counted by Cat^p(W) = \prod_{i=1}^n \frac{ph+d_i}{d_i}.
This is a suggestion for how to uniformly prove this formula for such W (note that in the non-well-generated case, Cat^p(W) is not even an integer). Such a uniform proof would be new, even for p=1.
We know case-by-case that Cat^p(W) counts multichains w_1 \leq w_2 \leq \cdots \leq w_p \leq c of length p in NC(W,c). Using standard zeta polynomial computations, we can relate multichains in [1,c]_T to strictly increasing chains in [1,c]_T, which we then interpret as reduced factorizations of the Coxeter element into nontrivial factors. It is interesting that even though the formula for multichains has a beautiful uniform expression, the formula for strict chains does not seem nice in general.
A k-block factorization of c is a factorization of c into k factors c=u_1 u_2 \cdots u_k,such that \sum_{i=1}^k \ell_T(u_i) = \ell_T(c) = n and u_i \neq 1.
Let Fact_k(c) denote the number of k-block factorizations of c.
Using the relation between multichains and strict chains, we obtain the identity \prod_{i=1}^n \frac{ph+d_i}{d_i} = \sum_{k=1}^n \binom{p+1}{k} Fact_k (c).
Despite the fact that Fact_k (c) does not seem to have a nice uniform formula in general, we do understand it geometrically—Fact_k (c) counts the cardinality of fibers of the Lyashko-Looijenga map. In particular, D. Bessis showed case-by-case that the generic fibers of this map correspond to n-block factorizations, or reduced decompositions in the reflections T [arXiv:math/0610777]. Even though it was done case-by-case, we have the uniform formula Fact_n(c) = \frac{n! h^n}{|W|} = \frac{(h)(2h)(3h)\cdots(nh)}{d_1 d_2 \cdots d_n}.V. Ripoll gave a similar formula for the almost generic fibers.Problem 1.1.
[V. Ripoll] Uniformly prove \prod_{i=1}^n \frac{ph+d_i}{d_i} = \sum_{k=1}^n \binom{p+1}{k} Fact_k (c)by interpreting the right-hand side as fibers of the Lyashko-Looijenga map.
Cite this as: AimPL: Rational Catalan combinatorics, available at http://aimpl.org/rationalcatalan.