3. Distribution of the Zeros of L-functions and their Derivatives.
-
Zeros of $\zeta'(s)$ Close to the Half Line.
Problem 3.1.
[Brian Conrey] Prove that there are zeros close to the half line and hence, improve the proportion of zeros of $\zeta$ on the half line. -
Algorithms for Computing Zeros of $\zeta'(s)$
Problem 3.2.
[Chris Hughes] Can one find practical algorithms for finding zeros of the derivative of $\zeta(s)$? -
The Double Hump Problem
It has been observed with numerical simulations that the (normalized) radial distribution of the zeros of $\Lambda'_X(z)$ has a bimodal distribution. David Farmer has a paper on the arxiv with numerical evidence of this. Analogously, a similar phenomenon has been observed for the horizontal distribution of zeros of $\zeta'(\frac{1}{2 }+it)$.Problem 3.3.
[Brian Conrey] Can we identify the source of the bimodal distribution? -
Correlation Statistics for Consecutive Pairs of Zeros of $\zeta(\frac{1}{2}+it)$.
Problem 3.4.
[Hugh Montgomery] If one chooses four consecutive zeros of $\zeta(\frac{1}{2}+it)$ at random high up the critical line, can you quantify the probability that the spacings of the two consecutive pairs differ from the mean? Some similar questions to consider are:- 1. Is the ‘Dot-Dash Conjecture’ true? This says that if two zeros are closer to each other on average, then this biases the following gap to be larger than average.
- 2. Soundararajan has asked, do $50$ percent of pairs have gaps smaller than the mean spacing?
- 3. Is the mean spacing also the median spacing? If not, then what is it?
-
Gaps Between Low Lying Zeros of Dirichlet L-functions
Problem 3.5.
[Henryk Iwaniec] Is it possible to quantify the gaps between low lying zeros of $L(s,\chi)$ and $L(s,\overline{\chi})$? For instance, can one estimate the size, as $\chi$ varies, of $|\gamma_1-\gamma_2|$ where $\gamma_1,\gamma_2$ are zeros of $L(s,\chi),L(s,\overline{\chi})$, respectively. -
Long Mollifiers
David Farmer has remarked that if one is using the simple zero method, then taking $\theta=4/7$ instead of $1/2$ gives a $4$ percent increase in the proportion of zeros.Problem 3.6.
[Andrew Pearce-Crump] Can we improve the percentage of simple zeros by taking a longer mollifier? -
Short Mollifiers
In a 2025 paper of Conrey, Farmer, Kwan, Lin and Turnage-Butterbaugh, it was shown that Levinson’s method will give a positive proportion of zeros on the critical line no matter how short the mollifier is.
Levinson’s method with twisted 4th vs 2nd moments can be found in a 2014 preprint of Hung Bui.Problem 3.7.
[Andrew Pearce-Crump] Prove that a positive proportion of zeros lie on the critical line by using Levinson’s method with a twisted 4th moment, no matter how short the mollifier is. -
The Distribution of Zeros of $\zeta'(s)$.
Problem 3.8.
[Brian Conrey] What is the horizontal distribution of $\rho-\frac{1}{2}$, where $\rho$ are the zeros of $\zeta'(s)$, on the scale of the mean spacing?
Cite this as: AimPL: Moments of the derivative of characteristic polynomials and L-functions, available at http://aimpl.org/lprime.