4. Resolutions
-
Compare \Delta-resolutions
Problem 4.1.
Can we directly compare the Hanlon-Hicks-Lazarev and Brown-Erman construction of resolutions?
\bullet Potential mechanism: (starting in degree 0)
{vertices/points in stratification of T^n arising in HHL} is in one to one correspondence with {additional generators for normalization of the semi-group ring, i.e. elements coming from saturation of semigroup} -
Topology/Morse theory of cellular resolutions
Problem 4.2.
Can we interpret resolutions via Fukaya categories? (e.g. minimizing resolutions through "cellular" operations) -
Topology/Morse theory of cellular resolutions
Problem 4.3.
The Morse-theoretic description of H_*(M) can be refined (at e.g. level of "framed flow categories"). can this refined decomposition tell us something on the algebraic side? -
T^n=K(\pi,1)
Problem 4.4.
Given a cellular resolution, is there a meaningful way to algebraically interpret topology of the cell complex beyond homology e.g. \pi_1? -
Topology/Morse theory of resolutions
Problem 4.5.
Is there an analogue of "Morse theory for cellular resolutions" for virtual resolutions? -
Observation: The current definition of virtual resolution is so broad and it is not meaningful to parameterize, then.
Problem 4.6.
Is there a well-behaved moduli theory of virtual resolutions equipped with extra structure? e.g. condition under which there exists a finite set? or space/ stacks/...? (c.f. [Boij-Sölderberg] theory constructs a meaningful cone of Betti tables of all free complexes. Look at subcone of virtual resolutions of a given M)
Cite this as: AimPL: Syzygies and mirror symmetry, available at http://aimpl.org/syzygyms.