1. Top four problem areas
These are the top four problem areas as agreed upon by all workshop participants.-
Problem 1.1.
Characterizing and modeling tumor heterogeneity
How do we characterize and account for heterogeneity? Are we targeting the right cell populations? Do cancer stem cells exist? If so, do they matter?
Notes:
(a) John Lowengrub (UC-Irvine) and Heiko Enderling (Tufts University) have studied math models about stem cells, and their results suggest that the presence of stem cells makes a big difference in outcomes.
(b) Whether there is agreement about what the cells might be called; if there is agreement about their function, that is a starting point.
(c) Stem cells might develop mutations and cause cancer, and non-stem cells may develop mutations and cause cancer.
(d) There exist viruses that are too virulent for their own good, and thus die out while less virulent viruses remain. Is there a corresponding scenario for tumor cells? Can we characterize the prognostic threat from different cells in the tumor? For example, are some cells more cloaked from the immune system than others?
(e) Research underway studying single cell heterogeneity in tumors, e.g., from Stephen Quake’s lab at Stanford (Dalerba et al. 2011). -
Problem 1.2.
Systems approaches to drug resistance -
Problem 1.3.
Linking signaling models to phenotype (e.g., tumor growth) -
Problem 1.4.
Translating pre-clinical models to human
Cite this as: AimPL: Systems approaches to drug discovery and development in oncology, available at http://aimpl.org/systemsoncology.