7. Borel complexity
-
Problem 7.05.
Is conjugacy by automorphism of masas of the hyperfinite II_{1} factor classifiable by countable structures? -
Problem 7.1.
What is the right set-theoretic framework to deal with functorial classification? -
Problem 7.15.
Is there a constructive Borel proof of the \mathcal{O}_{2} embedding theorem? -
Problem 7.2.
Is the isomorphism relation in the following classes of separable C*-algebras:- all
- nuclear
- exact
- simple
- simple exact
- nuclear \mathcal{Z}-stable
- simple nuclear
complete analytic? below a group actions? above all group actions? - all
-
Problem 7.25.
What is the complexity of isometric isomorphism of direct limits of not necessarily self-adjoint subalgebras of finite dimensional C*-algebras? How does it compare to the complexity of isomorphism of AF algebras? -
Problem 7.35.
For a separable C*-algebra A, what is the complexity of orbit equivalence relations associated to the action \mathrm{Aut}\left( A\right) on itself by conjugacy and to the action of \mathrm{Inn}\left( A\right) on \mathrm{\mathrm{Au}t}\left( A\right) by left translation? Are these action turbulent? How are they related to structural properties of A? -
Problem 7.4.
[Diximier] Is the Mackey Borel structure on the spectrum of a simple separable C*-algebra always the same when it is not standard?-
Remark. [Elliott] All nonstandard spectra of AF algebras are isomorphic.
-
-
Problem 7.45.
Does the complexity of the Mackey Borel structure of a simple separable C*-algebra increase as one goes from nuclear C*-algebras to exact ones to ones that are not even exact? -
If A is a C*-algebra, denote by E_A the relation of unitary equivalence of pure states of A.
Problem 7.5.
Assume A and B are C*-algebras and E_A is Borel-reducible to E_B. What does this fact imply about the relation between A and B?
Cite this as: AimPL: Set theory and C* algebras, available at http://aimpl.org/settheorycstar.