1. Galois groups acting on trees
-
Fixed point proportion of dynamical exceptional polynomials
Let G be a group acting on a infinite rooted tree, and denote G_n the action of G on the first n levels of the tree. We define the fixed-point proportion of G as FPP(G) = \lim_{n \rightarrow +\infty} \frac{\# \left\{g \in G_n: \text{ $g$ fixes at least one element on level $n$}\right\}}{\# G_n}.
Let k be a field, f \in k(z) of degree at least 2, and t \in k. Define k_n = k(f^{-n}(t)), G_n = Gal(k_n/k(t)) and G_\infty = \varprojlim G_n. The group G_n acts on f^{-n}(t) via the natural action of the Galois group, so G_\infty acts on the infinite rooted tree of the n-th preimages of t via f. \\
In particular, if k = \mathbb{C}(t) with t transcendental over \mathbb{C}, G_\infty is isomorphic to the closure of the iterated monodromy group of f, denoted IMG(f) (see Proposition 6.4.2 in [MR2162164]). Results in this direction can be found in [arXiv:1204.2843], where it is proved that for non dynamically exceptional rational functions, FPP(IMG(f)) = 0.
Let k be a field, f \in k(z) of degree at least 2, and t \in k. Define k_n = k(f^{-n}(t)), G_n = Gal(k_n/k(t)) and G_\infty = \varprojlim G_n. The group G_n acts on f^{-n}(t) via the natural action of the Galois group, so G_\infty acts on the infinite rooted tree of the n-th preimages of t via f.Problem 1.1.
[Santiago Radi] 1. What can we say about the fixed-point proportion of groups acting on rooted trees?
2. Fixing the tree T, can we find a family of groups such that its fixed-point proportion is nonzero and its Hausdorff dimension converges to 1?
3. What can we say about the fixed-point proportion of Galois groups?
4. What can we say about the fixed-point proportion of IMG(f) of complex rational functions?
5. What can we say about the fixed-point proportion of IMG(f) of complex polynomials that are not dynamically exceptional? -
Analogous of paths on iterated monodromy groups for iterated Galois groups of dynamical maps
Let k be a field, f \in k(z) of degree at least 2, and t be a transcendental number. Define k_\infty = k \left( \cup_{n \geq 0} f^{-n}(t) \right), L = k_\infty \cap \overline{k}, G_\infty = Gal(k_\infty/k(t)) and G_\infty^{geom} = Gal(k_\infty/L(t)). \\
It was proved by Richard Pink (see \cite[Proposition 6.4.2]{Self_similar_groups}) that when k = \mathbb{C}, then G_\infty^{geom} = \overline{IMG(f)} and for the iterated monodromy group of a continuous covering map, there is an explicit way to construct it by choosing paths between the chosen base point z_0 and f^{-1}(z_0). \\
Following the analogous of IMG(f), we know the iterated monodromy group of f can reconstruct the Julia set of f.Problem 1.2.
[Ophelia Adams] 1. Can we algebraically construct "nice" paths to describe G_\infty^{geom} by more explicit wreath recursions? More precisely, given z\in f^{-1}(t), can we find explicit endomorphisms of K_\infty, perhaps recursively described, sending t to z with nice properties? -
Wreath recursion for Galois groups
Problem 1.3.
1. Contruct explicit wreath recursions for Galois groups
2. Under what conditions is a group coming from a Galois arboreal representation a branch group? -
Reconstructing the Julia set of a function from the iterated Galois group
Let k be a finite field extension of \mathbb{Q}_p, f \in k(z) of degree at least 2, and t be a transcendental number. Define k_\infty = k \left( \cup_{n \geq 0} f^{-n}(t) \right), L = k_\infty \cap \overline{k}, G_\infty = Gal(k_\infty/k(t)) and G_\infty^{geom} = Gal(k_\infty/L(t)). \\Problem 1.4.
[Ophelia Adams] Can we reconstruct the p-adic Julia set of f from G_\infty or G_\infty^{geom} -
Orbit equivalence for IMG
Let G,H two groups acting on the same set X. We say that G and H are orbit equivalent if they have the same orbits. \\
Let f be a continuous map and IMG(f) its iterated monodromy group. Assume IMG(f) is countable and consider its action on \partial T, the boundary of the tree. \\Problem 1.5.
[Constantine Medynets] 1. Can we find \varphi \in Homeo(\partial T) such that the orbit of the group generated by \varphi and IMG(f) are orbit equivalent?
2. Can we make \varphi explicit?
Cite this as: AimPL: Groups of dynamical origin, available at http://aimpl.org/groupdynamorigin.