Loading Web-Font TeX/Math/Italic
| Register
\newcommand{\Cat}{{\rm Cat}} \newcommand{\A}{\mathcal A} \newcommand{\freestar}{ \framebox[7pt]{$\star$} }

2. Meaning of higher r-coefficients in \mathrm{DR}_g^{d,r}(A)

Asked by Jonathan Wise: Find a meaning of the r-coefficients of \mathrm{DR}_g^{d,r}(A) (a polynomial in r) for g=1, possibly after changing its definition.

Conjecture (Ranganathan, Wise) In genus 1, the degree 1 coefficient vanishes because the reduced DR cycle is equal to the reduced orbifold DR cycle.

For the objects appearing in the conjecture:
  • Reduced DR-cycle: a variant of the usual DR-cycle obtained from a compactification of the space of relative maps to \mathbb{P}^1, where we disallow contracted genus 1 components, but allow genus 1 singularities
  • Orbifold DR cycle: obtained from maps to \mathbb{P}^1 with B \mathbb{Z}_r at 0,\infty
  • Reduced orbifold DR cycle: Take the DR cycle, but disallow contracted g=1 components, allow elliptic singularities
The conjecture is part of a more general story, comparing relative and orbifold invariants of (X,D), where D is a smooth divisor on X. Here, one either places a relative condition, or an r-th root structure on D. It turns out that the genus g=0 invariants agree, but by work of Fenglong You, higher genus invariants do not agree. Yet, the r=0 terms of the orbifold side and the relative side agree.

      Cite this as: AimPL: Double ramification cycles and integrable systems, available at http://aimpl.org/doubleramific.