Loading Web-Font TeX/Math/Italic
| Register
\newcommand{\Cat}{{\rm Cat}} \newcommand{\A}{\mathcal A} \newcommand{\freestar}{ \framebox[7pt]{$\star$} }

1. A conjecture of Buryak-Rossi

Asked by Paolo Rossi : Starting with a semisimple CohFT (a generalization for non-semisimple CohFT’s can be formulated), there are two ways to associate to it an integrable hierarchy:
  • Dubrovin-Zhang associates to this an integrable hierarchy w_{t_i} = F_i^{DZ}(w,w_x,\ldots)
  • Double ramification gives another integrable hierarchy \tilde u_{t_i} = F_i^{DR}(\tilde u,\tilde u_x,\ldots)
Conjecture (Buryak,Rossi) There exists a normal Miura transformation relating the two hierarchies.

The conjecture has been tested for the trivial, the Hodge, and Witten (up to r=5) CohFT’s.

There exist two families of tautological cycles A,B with explicit combinatorial definition; proving equality proves above conjecture. Conjecture is about intersection numbers, equality of cycles would imply this. \int_A \Omega_{g,n}(v_1 \otimes \cdots \otimes v_n) = \int_B \Omega_{g,n}(v_1 \otimes \cdots \otimes v_n)
Maybe A=B?

A=B proved in g=0,1 and partial equality in g=2.

Side question: Does equality of intersection numbers with any CohFT imply equality of cycles? Would follow from question: How much of H^*(\overline{\mathcal{M}})_{g,n}) spanned by CohFTs? See [buryakrossi1].

      Cite this as: AimPL: Double ramification cycles and integrable systems, available at http://aimpl.org/doubleramific.