1. Problems
-
Obtain cancellations in additive twists of GL(3) Fourier coefficients
Problem 1.02.
[Matthew Young] Let \pi be a GL(3) Hecke–Maass cusp form with the n-th Fourier coefficient \lambda_\pi(1,n). For \alpha\in\mathbb{R}, prove a bound of the form \sum_{n\ll N} \lambda_\pi(1,n) e(n\alpha) \ll_\pi N^{1-\delta},for some \delta>0 using a delta method. Aim to improve upon Miller’s bound. -
Shifted convolution sum via various delta methods
Problem 1.04.
[Roman Holowinsky] For a holomorphic or a Hecke–Maass cusp form f with the nth Fourier coefficient \lambda_f(n), obtain cancellations in the summation \sum_{n\leq N} \lambda_f(n)\lambda_f(n+1),via- Duke-Friedlander-Iwaniec’s delta method
- Trivial delta method
- GL(2) Petersson trace formula as a delta method
- GL(3) Kuznetsov trace formula as a delta method.
Note: We do not yet have an explicit GL(3) Kuznetsov trace formula with arbitrary level and nebentypus. -
Level aspect subconvexity for GL(2)
Problem 1.06.
[Roman Holowinsky] Use a delta method to obtain level aspect subconvexity for GL(2) L-functions. -
Relationship between Trivial delta method and Nelson’s Kernel method
Problem 1.08.
[Paul Nelson] Let f be a holomorphic or Hecke–Maass cusp form of level 1 and \chi be a Dirichlet character of level p. For fixed f, a level aspect Burgess-type bound for L(f\times\chi, 1/2) can be obtained by (among many others) these two methods:- Trivial delta method,
- Using the Kernel K(z,w) = \sum_{\gamma\in\Gamma_0(p)} \omega(z^{-1}\gamma w) for z, x\in \mathbb{H} and \omega a smooth bump function, defined appropriately.
-
Character sums appearing in the works of Nelson, and Sharma
Problem 1.1.
[Paul Nelson] Relate or compare the exponential sums appearing in the work of Paul Nelson [cite], and the work of Prahlad Sharma [cite] in the proof for level aspect subconvexity bound for \rm GL(1) twists of \rm GL(3)\times GL(2) L-functions. -
Subconvexity bound for trace function twists
Problem 1.12.
[Philippe Michel] Subconvexity bounds for \rm GL(1) twists of a fixed \rm GL(2)\times GL(2) L-function has been proved using a delta symbol by C. Raju [cite] in the archimedean aspect, and by A. Ghosh [cite] in the level aspect. Can we generalize these techniques to replace the \rm GL(1) twist by a trace function, or an appropriate archimedean analog? -
Subconvexity for \rm GL(3)\times GL(1) via averaging over a family
Let \pi be a fixed Hecke-Maass cusp form for \rm SL_3(\mathbb{Z}), and \chi be a character of level M. Munshi [cite] used Petersson trace formula as a delta method to obtain a subconvexity bound for L(1/2, \pi\times\chi) as M varies.Problem 1.14.
[Rizwan Khan] Can we obtain a subconvexity bound by averaging over a family, e.g. by bounding \sum_{\chi\bmod M} |L(1/2, \chi)|^2. -
Application to Quantum Unique Ergodicity
Holowinsky and Soundararajan proved the Quantum Unique Ergodicity conjecture in the case of holomorphic Hecke eigenforms by combining two different approaches: By proving a non-trivial bound on certain shifted convolution sum, and by proving (weak) subconvexity bound for certain L-functions.Problem 1.16.
[Roman Holowinsky] Obtaining a bound of the form \sum_{f,g \in \mathcal{B}_k} L(1/2, sym^2f) L(1/2, sym^2g)\big|\sum_{n\leq k} \lambda_f(n)\lambda_g(n+h)\big|^2 \ll k^{4-\delta},for |h|\ll 1 and some \delta>0 would imply the result of Holowinsky and Soundararajan (conditionally on non-negativity of the central values L(1/2, sym^2f)).
Use a delta method in order to prove the above bound. -
GL(3) Kuznetsov trace formula in the level aspect
Problem 1.18.
[Jack Buttcane] Develop a Kuznetsov trace formula for automorphic forms for the group \Gamma_0(N) = \left\lbrace \begin{pmatrix} \star & \star & \star \\ \star & \star & \star \\ 0 & 0 & \star \end{pmatrix} \bmod N \right\rbrace for any integer N\geq1.
For the purpose of applications, develop a Kuznetsov trace formula for automorphic forms for the group \Gamma_B(N) = \left\lbrace \begin{pmatrix} \star & \star & \star \\ 0 & \star & \star \\ 0 & 0 & \star \end{pmatrix} \bmod N \right\rbrace. -
Subconvexity bound for Rankin-Selberg L-functions
Problem 1.2.
[Paul Nelson] Obtain a subconvexity bound for a \rm GL_n\times GL_m Rankin–Selberg L-function when n and m are not coprime.
The simplest first cases would be obtaining a subconvexity bound (in any aspect) for a \rm GL_4\times GL_2 L-function or a \rm GL_3\times GL_3 L-function. -
Cancellations in additive twists on average
Problem 1.22.
[Xiaoqing Li] Let \alpha\in\mathbb{R} and f_j be a Maass form for \rm SL(4, \mathbb{Z}) with eigenvalue t_j and Fourier coefficients \{\lambda_j(1,1,n)\}_{n\geq1}. For parameters T and N, prove a non-trivial bound for the averaged sum \sum_{t_j\sim T} \bigg|\sum_{n\leq N}\lambda_j(1,1,n)e(n\alpha) \bigg|^2.
If \{f_j\} are Maass forms for \rm SL(3, \mathbb{Z}) improve Miller’s bound on average over the spectral parameter t_j. -
Asymptotic for second moment of \rm GL_2\times GL_2 in level aspect
Problem 1.24.
[Roman Holowinsky] Let \mathcal{B}_k(p) be a basis for holomorphic or Hecke-Maass forms for \Gamma_0(p)\subset SL_2(\mathbb{Z}) of weight k. Obtain an asymptotic with a power saving error term for the second moment \sum_{f\in\mathcal{B}_k(p)}\sum_{g\in\mathcal{B}_\ell(q)} |L(1/2, f\times g)|^2,as the level p and q become larger, the weights k and \ell are fixed. -
Subconvexity bound for \rm GL_3\times GL_2 in level aspect
Problem 1.26.
[Ritabrata Munshi] Let \pi be a fixed Hecke-Maass cusp form for SL_3(\mathbb{Z}) and f be a holomorphic for Hecke Maass cusp form for \Gamma_0(M). Obtain a subconvexity bound estimate for L(1/2, \pi\times f) as M grows. -
Shifted convolution sum for \rm GL_3\times GL_2 in level aspect
Problem 1.28.
[Roman Holowinsky] Let \pi be a fixed Hecke-Maass cusp form for SL_3(\mathbb{Z}) with Fourier coefficients \{\lambda_\pi(r,n)\} and f be a holomorphic for Hecke Maass cusp form for \Gamma_0(M) with Fourier coefficients \{\lambda_f(n)\}. Obtain a non-trivial bound for the shifted sum, \begin{equation*} \sum_{n<N}\lambda_\pi(r,n)\lambda_f(n+1), \end{equation*}in the convexity range N\sim M^{3/2}. -
\rm GL_3 Kuznetsov trace formula as a \delta-method
Problem 1.3.
[Ritabrata Munshi] Obtain t-aspect subconvexity for a \rm GL_2 L-function by using \rm GL_3 Kuznetsov trace formula as a \delta-method. -
Delta method over Number fields
Problem 1.32.
[Matthew Young] Design a delta symbol method over number fields in order to generalize the classical techniques to the number fields setting. -
Strong hybrid bounds for L(1/2, f\times \chi)
Let f be a holomorphic or Hecke-Maass cusp form of level p, and \chi be a primitive Dirchlet character of level q. Conrey–Iwaniec obtained a Weyl type subconvexity bound for L(1/2, f\times\chi) when p=q, while Khan has obtained a Burgess-type bound when p\asymp q, and Yang has proved a Burgess-type bound over number fields in a similar range.Problem 1.34.
[Matthew Young] Prove strong hybrid bounds for other ranges of p and q. -
Subconvexity bound \rm GL_2 in the ‘conductor dropping’ case
Problem 1.36.
[Matthew Young] Let f be a holomorphic or Hecke-Maass cusp form for \rm GL_2. Use a \delta-method to prove the following subconvexity bounds for the following L-functions:- Level aspect subconvexity bound for L(1/2, f) where f has level p prime (and may have non-trivial nebentypus).
- Subconvexity for L(1/2+it_f, f), where f is a Maass form of level 1 and spectral parameter t_f.
- Level aspect subconvexity bound for L(1/2, f) where f has level p prime (and may have non-trivial nebentypus).
-
Bound for short second moment of \rm GL_4 L-functions
Problem 1.38.
[Keshav Aggarwal] Let f be a fixed Hecke-Maass cusp form for \rm GL_4(\mathbb{Z}), T and \Delta be parameters. Prove a non-trivial bound for \int_T^{T+\Delta} |L(\frac12+it, f)|^2 dt,for \Delta = T^\delta with some \delta<1. -
Applications of trace formula towards point counting
Problem 1.4.
[Anurag Sahay] Various circle methods and \delta-methods have been successfully used to count points on varieties. Could one use Petersson or Kuznetsov trace formula as a \delta-method to count point on varieties? -
Hardy-type theorem for \rm GL_3 L-functions
Problem 1.42.
Use a \delta-method to prove that there are infinitely many critical zeros for a \rm GL_3(\mathbb{Z}) L-functions.
Cite this as: AimPL: Delta symbols and the subconvexity problem , available at http://aimpl.org/deltasubconvex2.