Loading Web-Font TeX/Math/Italic
| Register
\newcommand{\Cat}{{\rm Cat}} \newcommand{\A}{\mathcal A} \newcommand{\freestar}{ \framebox[7pt]{$\star$} }

5. Miscellaneous

    1. Rational sliceness

      Problem 5.1.

      [Jae Choon Cha] Is every knot in S^3 which is slice in some rational homology ball actually slice in some \mathbb{Z}[1/2]-homology ball?
        • Difficult sliceness problems

          Problem 5.2.

          Are any of the following slice?
          1. The (2,1) cable of the figure-eight knot.
          2. The positive Whitehead double of any left-handed torus knot.
          3. The positive Whitehead double of the figure-eight knot.
          4. The (+,+,-) Whitehead double of the Borromean rings.
            1. Remark. It is known that C_{2,1}(4_1) is rationally slice but is not ribbon.
                • Remark. [Jae Choon Cha] The problem of sliceness of C_{2,1}(4_1) is important for the classification of the L^2-acyclic bordism group.
                    • Attacks on slice-ribbon

                      Problem 5.3.

                      [Clayton McDonald] Find new ways to build knots which are by construction slice but not by construction ribbon.
                        1. Remark. Gompf-Scharlemann-Thompson give some examples, but their construction produces intrinsically homotopy ribbon knots.

                          Cochran-Davis give some examples as well.
                            • Remark. [Adam Levine] One might also want to switch perspective to ribbon links, where there is a Jones polynomial obstruction due to Eisermann.
                                • Understanding topological slice discs

                                  Problem 5.4.

                                  [Maggie Miller] Explicitly describe some non-smooth topologically slice disc.
                                      Potential approach: one might try for some sort of infinite band sum of an infinite component unlink.
                                    • Topological ribbon concordance

                                          Gordon asked whether two knots which are mutually ribbon concordant must be isotopic. This problem offers a topological version.

                                      Problem 5.5.

                                      [Mark Powell] Define knots K and J to be topologically homotopy ribbon concordant, and write K \leq_{thrc} J, if K and J are topologically concordant via an annulus A such that the inclusion-induced map \pi_1(X_K) \to \pi_1(X_A) is a surjection and the inclusion-induced map \pi_1(X_J) \to \pi_1(X_A) is an injection. Is \leq_{thrc} a partial order on the collection of knots in S^3?
                                        • Grope metric

                                          Problem 5.6.

                                          [Shelly Harvey] Understand the grope metric d_1 defined by Cochran-Harvey-Powell [MR3665407].
                                              A closely related question is whether there exists a non smoothly slice knot which bounds an infinite height symmetric grope where all surfaces have genus 1, and whether such a knot must be topologically slice.
                                            • Metrics on \mathcal{T}

                                              Problem 5.7.

                                              [Shelly Harvey] Construct an interesting (i.e. non-discrete, perhaps nice with respect to the bipolar filtration) metric on the set of topologically slice knots.
                                                • Round Handle Problem

                                                  Problem 5.8.

                                                  [Mark Powell] Given a linking number 0 link L, construct a 4-manifold W by attaching a round handle to B^4 along each component of L. Must L be topologically slice in W?
                                                    1. Remark. [Mark Powell] If both topological surgery and the s-cobordism theorem for 4-manifolds hold, then the answer is ‘Yes’, so it would be very interesting to prove ’No’.

                                                          Cite this as: AimPL: Smooth concordance classes of topologically slice knots, available at http://aimpl.org/concordsliceknot.