4. Uniform Indiscernibles
-
Let \kappa be an infinite cardinal and put \lambda=\kappa^+. Define u_2(\kappa)=\sup\left\{(\lambda^+)^{L[A]}:A\subseteq\kappa\right\}.
Problem 4.25.
[Magidor]- Is u_2(\omega_1)=\omega_3 consistent with (sufficiently) large cardinals?
- How to increase u_2(\omega_1) without collapsing \omega_1 or \omega_2?
-
Remark. The answer is trivially yes if V=L, so the relevant cardinals should be sufficiently large.
It is known that u_2(\omega)=\omega_2 implies u_2(\omega_1)<\omega_3 under certain large cardinals assumptions (\text{NS}_{\omega_1} is saturated and it has a sharp). -
Remark. [Larson] u_2(\omega_1)=\omega_3 is impossible if \text{NS}_{\omega_1} is saturated (more generally, if there is a generic embedding with critical point \omega_1 which fixed \omega_3).
Cite this as: AimPL: From ℵ2 to infinity, available at http://aimpl.org/alephtwo.